on account of market microstructure frictions, transaction prices may deviate from the equilibrium price, generating transaction costs. As we have noted, the bid–ask spread is a frequently used indicator of market liquidity. This differential is an important component of trading costs, often referred to as implicit transaction costs to distinguish them from explicit costs such as brokerage fees and taxes. We will offer different measures of the spread, each one focusing on a different interpretation.

The quoted spread, or the difference between the best ask and best bid prices offered by liquidity suppliers, is an estimate of the costs that a generic investor incurs for a round-trip transaction, i.e. a purchase followed by a sale. On the other hand, the realized spread is an estimate of the gain a market-maker can expect to make from two consecutive transactions. We show that the two definitions coincide when transaction costs consist solely in order-processing costs. We will also show that the difference between the quoted and the realized spread, which is always positive or at least zero, is a positive function of adverse selection and inventory costs. This difference can also be affected by the number of transactions at prices within the spread, as well as by order fragmentation. Furthermore, we will provide a definition of the effective spread, which is twice the difference between the transaction price and the midpoint of the quoted bid–ask spread and is therefore a better proxy of transaction costs when quoted prices are not binding.

Socially responsible mutual funds are an extreme example of asset gatherers using your values and neediness to turn you into a profit center for them. Socially responsible funds buy companies that they deem good corporate citizens or that follow certain religious or moral guidelines. They tend to avoid tobacco stocks, companies that discriminate or do not hire union workers, firearms and weapons manufacturers, and companies that pollute the environment.

While you are under the illusion your money is doing good, mutual fund companies operate on the hard fact that socially responsible fund investors do not trade funds and have low standards for investment return. These funds all buy the same stocks and produce the same mediocre returns, but their asset bases grow steadily. In recent years, socially responsible funds have been among the fastest growing asset gatherers. More importantly, your investment does not go directly to the company doing “good.” Your cash is used to buy shares from other stockholders who are tired of the company. A direct investment in a socially responsible enterprise or in a public offering of new shares is rare. When you discover that your money is enriching fund managers, not you or your causes, you may feel betrayed. If stocks are outside your comfort zone, you will feel better giving directly to the endeavor you support and investing the rest of your funds within your comfort zone.

You can invest a small amount of money (and a lot of hard work and well-spent time) in a small business and see it grow into a business that is worth a million in seven years. I’ve done it many times. I’ve coached people who have done it. Stories are published in magazines every month about people who have done it.

But let’s be frank. With only $18,000 to $25,000 to invest, it won’t be easy. That’s why I like to encourage Early to Rise readers who are at this first wealth-building stage to focus most of their time and efforts on building their income. Doubling your income in a year or two is entirely possible if you follow the advice I gave you in previous posts. And if you double your income and don’t double your lifestyle, you’ll have a lot more money left over to ensure the success of your small side business.

Here are five things I recommend if you are in this situation:

1. Find a way to radically increase your salary by making yourself radically more valuable at work.
2. Resist the temptation to spend more money as your income rises.
3. Put some of your savings down on an undervalued, small, single-family house, fix it up fast, and sell it for a profit.
4. Reinvest that original capital plus the profit in another buyand-flip deal. Keep doing this until it becomes a very pleasant habit.
5. Invest another portion of your savings in a part-time, weekend business. Sell a product or service you know and understand.

Make sure you are not a pioneer. Unless there are others actively selling the same thing, you don’t want to be in the market. The idea is to enter an active market with a better/cleverer/cheaper version of what others are selling. Sell only by direct response—print, mail, and Internet. Go carefully and learn from your mistakes.

I’m no Donald Trump. I don’t even consider myself a professional real estate investor. I’m a professional marketer who has made real estate investing a nice sideline business. But in the 11 years that I’ve been doing it, my real estate portfolio has grown and grown. As an income producer, real estate has never failed to provide me with less than a very substantial income. As an asset builder, my rental real estate properties have all paid for themselves and provided me with a rate of return that is at least 10 times what I’ve been able to get from stocks and bonds.

Munis have tremendous tax advantages. Interest paid is not subject to federal, state, or local taxes. However, many savers will find the tax advantage caused them to invest outside their comfort zone. Calls, volatility, and insecure principal may be more than you can handle.

Trust issues are worse for muni funds than for other bond funds. Muni funds offer the advantage of diversification and professional management.

Unfortunately, the fees eat up as much as 25 percent of your interest. This is seldom worthwhile. Muni fund managers rarely outperform a list of unmanaged bonds. Many also try to rev up returns with lower credit issues, including junk munis, and borrow against the fund to increase investments in an attempt to time the market. These tactics are not likely to improve your sleep.

Unmanageability is a big issue with municipal bonds (munis). (Munis are bonds issued by states and local governments.) State and local government bonds are less secure than federal government bonds. The federal government can print money to pay bond interest and principal. With munis, defaults are possible, because state and local governments do not have the power to print money. Although defaults are rare, they occur. Many munis are secured by specific projects. If the project is bad, the muni could default.

Other munis are secured by a general fund. However, mismanagement of the general fund can endanger your muni. For example, the Orange County (California) general fund in 1993 and 1994 was run like a hedge fund. The fund manager invested in derivatives and leveraged up the fund just when interest rates rose dramatically, bankrupting the county. This type of mismanagement can lead to feelings of outrage among bondholders.

Munis are sometimes insured, but the insurer needs to be solid for the insurance to be any help. State and local governments sometimes establish a fund, known as a sinking fund, to be used to pay off specific bonds when they come due. These bonds are known as prerefunded bonds. Prerefunded bonds are more secure as long as the sinking fund is never attached.

Occasionally, bond investors experience complete powerlessness. When interest rates and inflation rise dramatically, the value of bonds declines dramatically. If prospects are for continued high interest rates and inflation, bond interest will never compensate for lost purchasing power. In the 1960s, government bonds paid 5 percent or less in interest. During the 1970s, inflation averaged better than 8 percent. Bond investors who bought in the 1960s sat by powerless as the purchasing power of their principal and interest dwindled.

On the other hand, treasuries are the best asset class during extended periods of deflation. In the 1930s, treasury savers had to guard against grandiosity rather than inferiority. Treasuries were the best asset class.

Selling government bonds before maturity brings up feelings of regret if interest rates have risen and the bonds must be sold for less than face value. Commissions, as well as spreads, must also be paid.

Letting bonds mature eliminates both commissions and spreads. Still, when bonds mature, the saver is faced with the dilemma of what to do with the principal. For some, the answer is simple. Others experience anxiety.

Savers who fret over what to buy may be more comfortable in bond funds where the money manager makes all the buy decisions.

The complexity of purchase may lead you to rely on a salesperson. Government bonds are purchased from brokers, banks, and directly from the federal government. Buying from brokers and banks can bring up issues of trust. Whereas you may have a great degree of confidence that government bonds are secure and the tax consequences predictable, you may not trust that the product you are being sold benefits you as much as it benefits the salesperson. Buying treasuries directly from the federal government might also create fear. You may believe that with a salesperson holding your hand, you would find a better product at a better price.

Government notes and bonds are often sold in bundles as managed mutual funds, unmanaged index funds and trusts, or as closed-end mutual funds. Here the issues get more complex. Built-in resentment and regret are inevitable. Fees and commissions must be paid to mutual fund managers, brokers, and closed-end fund managers. These funds rarely do better than notes and bonds bought by an individual and held to maturity. It is easy to regret the fees paid for poorly performed services. Yet some savers feel the need to use professionals to pick bonds for them. They would have free-floating fear and worry if they were to construct a portfolio of bonds on their own. You must ask yourself how you are likely to react.

The range of emotion from government notes and bonds is similar to that for short-term securities. While many may be asking why corporate notes and bonds are not included here, the answer is simple. Corporate debt is risky. Only investors and speculators should consider it. U.S. government notes and bonds are for savers whose primary concern is the return of their principal and whose secondary concern is the receipt of interest. There is a
real possibility of losing some principal with corporate debt.

Before purchasing treasuries, you will be exposed to complexity. The possibilities in government bonds are great. You can invest for one year or 29 years or any period in between. Certain bonds, such as Series EE, H, and I have tax advantages. Interest rates differ for every maturity and every type of bond. For most notes and bonds, the principal value is fixed.

For inflation-indexed treasuries, known as TIPs, the principal value increases every year we experience inflation. The principal value of I bonds also adjusts with inflation. However, even though the principal value of most bonds or notes is fixed, bonds sell at prices higher or lower than the principal value, depending on the current level of interest rates and the supply and demand of similar bonds and notes. The mathematics of computing the proper price for a note or bond is complex.

During ownership, some savers also experience a sense of regret. High inflation in the 1970s reduced the purchasing power of savings and was not compensated for by interest paid. When real estate was hot in the early 1980s, savers regretted they were not participating. The stock bubble of the late 1990s also led to regrets and jealousy. However, savers who hold out experience a sense of satisfaction when bubbles burst and speculators scramble to place their remaining funds in savings instruments.

When CDs mature and must be rolled over, savers experience a mixed set of emotions. Higher interest rates can lead to joy unless inflation has risen such that purchasing power will be lost. Lower rates can lead to regret that a long-term investment was not made.

Liquidating savings often triggers many emotions. A source of security is dying. When savings must be substantially liquidated, a grieving process begins. The saver may experience a wide range of emotions including sadness, regret, anger, resentment, helplessness, confusion, and free-floating fear. Generally, the cause of liquidation will compound the emotional mix. A divorce often requires a non-working spouse to both watch her savings dwindle as she reenters the work force and grieves the loss of her marriage.